The concept photos look nice but the last shot from the back could've been anything. As I read the page from the bottom (latest post) upwards I actually thought it was a BMW at first glance, due to that thing near the rear window. I too can't stand the iPad dash and wouldn't buy a car with one. Ferrari need to stop that asap as it looks absolutely stupid.
The concept photos look nice but the last shot from the back could've been anything. As I read the page from the bottom (latest post) upwards I actually thought it was a BMW at first glance, due to that thing near the rear window. I too can't stand the iPad dash and wouldn't buy a car with one. Ferrari need to stop that asap as it looks absolutely stupid.
Mike (good to "see" you and hope you guys are all well?)
I agree, with the above. I think the F8 looks better than the 488, but I just cant get excited by the interior and all this ipdad dash stuff. The Battista was up at one of the local petrol head haunt last year; and whilst I never saw it in the flesh there were a fair few pics only, and whilst I couldn't care less about anything electric (other than my Makita drill!) the styling looked stunning. They all seem to be saturating the market place with models and specials, which at the end of the day will pop the market; especially now I would think.
If I could (and I certainly cant) the only one of the current line up I'd like is the 812 GTS. I have asked my local dealer to make sure somebody buys one in blue, with crema interior and Daytona seats, willing to sell in 5-10 years time :laugh:
It’s a difficult one with the driver interface because what SHOULD be driving the new car market is largely the advances in the human / machine interface. We have just done a concept car that takes this up another notch with the drivers emotions in ‘race’ mode being projected into the ambient lighting of the car along with human ‘systems’ tracking. Think fighter pilots G-suit type connection for track work. Of course those familiar with the aerospace world know that we have had ‘fully glass cockpits’ for decades. The idea in fighter aircraft was primarily designed to reduce pilot workload and focus on the many task(s) in hand and in many ways the automotive sector has not quite followed suit. For sports / supercars I have been continually underwhelmed by the lack of progress in this area. I think the right electronics could dramatically enhance the driving experience but a lack of imagination and Luddite attitude by many OEM’s has failed to give the enthusiast driver features they would want.
Any touchscreen controls in cars should be binned, awful to use and IMO very dangerous forcing the driver to take eyes completely off the road to use. Can't beat mechanical dials & buttons for all controls. How many accidents have the touch screens contributed to? See here some pretty important people of the same opinion:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49319450
...ahhh my day job that; but on our fleet! Typical swiss cheese accident model! For those interested in this sort of thing, the report into both Fitzgerald and McCain is at the bottom of this link. https://gcaptain.com/u-s-navy-relea...s-fitzgerald-and-uss-john-s-mccain-collisions.
There was also an article somewhere that Honda are rowing back on the touch screen use, limiting the functions that are accessed for exactly the reasons you say. Absolute classic case of not apply robust safety assessment integrated with human factors analysis. Blatantly obvious issue to anybody with 2 cents between their ears; but undoubtedly lead and driven by stylists and marketing people. (And don't even get me started on the lunacy of semi and "autonomous" cars!)
Besides; you can't beat twiddling a knob now can you? :wink3::grin:
I agree. There's so much more that could be done, the current approach is just lazy.It’s a difficult one with the driver interface because what SHOULD be driving the new car market is largely the advances in the human / machine interface....
To be fair, what they do in the Aerospace industry has moved on considerable from fully glass cockpits. The snag is tech comes at a price and the automotive industry has to have at least half an eye on cost. To give it perspective, the F35 helmet alone costs more than a Ferrari 488 Pista Spider or 812 Superfast, I'm talking per helmet. The numbers as far as cost goes between the automotive and aerospace industry aren't even comparable any more.
I was with Joint Force Harrier for most of my time in the RAF and a few of the younger guys from there have moved onto the F35. They quite like the new tech:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3aimm04SWU
Our paths will have crossed.
I built Harrier wings as an aircraft fitter... Ended up on the carriers with them some years later.
Was very familiar with the FIST program and how that led into Naval Air Ops and RAF Changes.
Still do quite a bit of work in the sector